Read, understand and consent to the blog's DISCLAIMER here before proceeding to read the article
Additional Disclaimer: Please note this post is speculative and inevitably would be riddled with inaccuracies and errors in judgement. This is HIGHLY RISKY investment(esp common equity) esp with the legal uncertainty revolving around the conservator-ship. If legal judgments don't go in favor of private shareholders, then stock holders get ZERO.
First things First: If you are a shareholder of GSE, please sign shareholder petition here. This is created by non-profit organization by Ralph Nader who is fighting for shareholder rights
Background: Fannie and Freddie don't directly make loans. Rather, they buy mortgages from lenders, package them as bonds, guarantee them against default and sell them to investors. In doing so, they help make loans available and exert influence over the housing market. Together, Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half of U.S. mortgages — nearly 31 million home loans worth $5 trillion. And along with other federal agencies, they back about 90 percent of new mortgages. This link provides a fantastic historical perspective, multi-decade profitability of GSE, financial condition of GSE, significantly improved underwriting quality since 2009(half of the current portfolio) that will bode well for future profitability compared to historical profitability, and talks about return to stockholder control. This is a MUST-READ document and is fairly recent(Aug 2013). An interesting quote from the above article: For stockholders, the economics of the GSEs’ mortgage business could be attractive, but the psychology of the decline in stock prices and the federal government’s claim on all profits could potentially offset this plus
Everyday the headline and sound bytes news on GSE is about the Reorganization and the potential lesser government role in GSE. For investors, this is a 'red herring' news to focus on. Investors are wrongly focused on the uncertainty of Government or Congress action on the various Re-org Proposal. Instead the clear signs of lack of distress and profitability in GSE, investors should be focused on the Court decision on Aug 2012 agreement and the current significant undervaluation of GSE. This will largely determine whether the upside to common equity is limited or is very significant.
Mr. Ackman owns 10% in equity of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and has expressed his intent to be part of the Recapitalization proposal discussion with the US Treasury( 1 of senior preferred holders as well as $187b loan issuer which is now nearly paid out) amongst other stakeholders. Ackman was buying all the way until Nov 14th and started buying the shares Oct. 7 and accelerated purchases after Oct. 21. Ackman paid a total of $401 million for his combined holdings. The backbone of the thesis on investing in commons could likely be the following. BTW here is Ackman's recent interview
Thesis on Investing in Common Equity
1. Constitutional challenge(5th amendment-property rights) of Aug 2012 "Net Sweep agreement"(profits are being swept and given to US Treasury) and the breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders (read Legal perspectives below). See the website Restorefannie. The court hearing date is Dec 6th. Mr. Ackman is likely convinced that Conservatorship fiduciary duty towards shareholders has to be honored, esp considering GSE was on road to profitability and was not in distress even back in Aug 2012 when the net sweep agreement was signed. In any case, the 2 parties may be focused on negotiating the path forward since $187b is nearly repaid and the path forward would likely be restoring conservatorship's fiduciary duty to shareholders since GSE clearly are not showing signs of deep distress(although they are far from capital adequacy). So while the actual exit option may take a long time and congressional consensus, the court judgment will clearly RE-Rate the Common equity because such a judgement on breach of fiduciary duty would emphatically restore the rights back to its common shareholders. BTW here is Ralph Nader (congressman) interview is on the side of shareholders.
Quote from below article
"The Third Amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement represents just this kind of one-sided transaction. Yet the government seeks to avoid this obvious implication by three specious arguments. First, it claims that there really was a mutually beneficial bargain here. After all, the Third Amendment was needed “because of a concern that the Enterprises, although solvent with Treasury’s assistance, would fail to generate enough revenue to fund the 10 percent dividend obligation.” Fat chance. Indeed, the one way to magnify the miniscule risk of default is to strip Fannie and Freddie of liquidity by the unilateral “dividend” payment made to the government. As a conservator, FHFA is supposed to defend shareholders, not fork over their money to Treasury."
- Court Calendar
- Richard Epstein perspective - audio recording (listen carefully bw 10 to 15 min)
- Litany of lawsuits from Shareholders against the US
- Fairholme lawsuit against US
- Another preferred shareholder Lawsuit
- Some perspectives on the Lawsuit between government and investors.
- Grand Theft Treasury
- Washington Federal Response to Government motion to Dismiss
- Fairhome Response: http://www.valueplays.net/2013/12/23/fairholme-responds-treasury-motion/
Generally speaking, Mr. Ackman is in for the long term. Ackman is a real estate expert and has great credibility when it comes non-operational restructuring (non-business related as in Balance sheet restructuring, forecasting legal outcomes) as was witnessed in General Growth. The equity investment in General Growth Ackman made has grown >20 times in a few years. Here is another article that gives some historical perspective along with various exit options. "By law, conservatorship will end with their return to stockholder control if the GSEs become safe and solvent or with receivership if they are unable to pay their debts". Right now Fannie mae only has net worth of $10b with a balancesheet of ~2.75T, but if and when the sweep is terminated those $9b/quarter earnings(see earnings presentation below) would start to add to the capital base and it is easy to see capital adequacy($150b?) within 2-3 years for the current balance sheet(without any new injection of external capital) provided sweep is terminated & housing rebound continues(Fed has announced to keep short term rates low until at least mid-2015. GSE finance portion of their investment portfolio with short term borrowing).
3. Alignment of incentives between Govt(Taxpayer) and Private shareholders as Govt owns rights to 80% warrants based on Sept 2008 agreement. So one can rest assured the Govt would want to maximize their profit and protect their interest in common esp after the $187b is paid out and the govt sees reduced risk in GSE from a capital adequacy standpoint. Note however though, it would take 2-3 years for the GSE's to be considered well adequate. So Ackman could be sitting with the US govt on the same side, helping to figure out how best to maximize the value or their pay out to common in whatever exit option the govt or congress decides.In this sense , the GSE Exit option and political consensus needed and the net sweep agreement with constitutional challenge is somewhat of a Red Herring that the Market is currently focusing because both the GOVT(thru its 80% warrants) and Private Shareholders are on the SAME side (and it is clear due to the housing rebound there is NO immediate capital needs for GSE)..Both own stakes in GSE. Also note that the government could be sympathetic to stockholders for another reason: A number of employees of GSE have historically owned stock of GSE's.
4. MOAT of GSE A.K.A The Monopoly it is
This is ONLY enterprise(monopoly) that has the below advantage: Ability to consistently make highly attractive NIM (net interest income) by matching LONG Term mortgage rates with LONG Term Agency backed MBS or Agency Bonds. This competitive advantage for Funding exists because of the implicit government backing the agency enjoys for its MBS and Bonds.
5. Their earnings will likely be more insulated with what happens in the economy compared to 2008,2009. This is because of underwriting quality since 2008 which is now materially superior and it is 50% of their portfolio and their loan loss provisioning (and credit losses) will likely be in control even if housing prices go south (higher LTV Ratio,higher borrow quality and such).
6. Without GSE (a.k.a implicit guarantee for agency MBS to investors), the affordability of 30 year mortgages(pivotal support for home ownership in the US) will no longer exist. So shut down of GSE is unlikely.
The Berkowitz Proposal
Speculating on the Value of GSE's Common Equity
Back of the Envelope Calculations (This is a highly oversimplifying calculation. I am ignoring debt because as of most recent quarter GSE had a positive net worth): So the question is what could be the residual equity value to private shareholders after paying off preferreds and the govt:
OldCo's value(runoff of existing assets) + NewCo value (Securitization platform+IP+Human Cap +Goodwill+Relationships) =
Prefered's Dividends (7%) + Preferred's Principal ($136b-FNMA + $86b-FMCC = $222b) + Common equity ($20b*-FNMA + $10b*-FMCC) + 80% warrants given to US Treasury
Note*-based on stock price of ~$3.3
Obviously Mr. Ackman is betting the left side of the above equation is much bigger than > $242b (not counting preferred dividends) ? Note, both FNMA and FMCC reported ~$9b in quarterly earnings each. Remember also, as housing market improved, extraordinarily, both Fannie and Freddie have paid out $187b in the last 4 years what they had borrowed from Treasury during the crisis. So if housing rebound continues and less so short term interest rates remain low(as GSE finances a part of investment portfolio with short term funds), and FNMA and FMCC can earn net profits of $72b/year(annualizing Q3's ~18b net profit), and the number $252b just translates 3.5 times its net profit (removing one-time incoming from release of tax deferred asset/valuation allowance-then you get $45b for FNMA alone. So the $72b in income for GSE seems reasonable). Assuming average 7% interest on ALL preferred, that translates to $15b/year on the $222b preferred..So that would still be 4.42 times net profit.
At 10 times EBITDA, enterprise value would be at 10*$90b=$900b or $678b left over for common equity . Factoring in US Govt 80% warrants, private shareholders equity would be valued at 0.20*$678b = $134b (approx 4.5 times present price) . This is where Mr. Ackman's legal, real estate, restructuring and value maximizing expertise fits in nicely in terms of preserving value for existing equity holders (as he did in General growth)
Near term catalysts
- Dec 17th - Defendants file briefs on the suit (Aug-2012 agreement challenge)
- Legal proceedings of the various investor suits. Look at the court calendar here
- Word spreads on 5th amendment case - Lobbying by investors and other stakeholders -> restorefannie
- Ackman's investor letter (his thesis on FNMA could be disclosed)
- Potential NYSE Listing (2014,2015?)
- Capital adequacy and returning control to stock holders (2015? 2016?)
- Ability to raise non-dilutive capital from a position of strength(2015?)
Is it possible that the OldCo itself can make whole the preferreds (dividends & principal) and NewCo's value will entirely inure to existing Common equity? Or could some of the preferreds stay in OldCo and some just transferred to NewCo's capital structure?
The other question is to ask is "Will the NewCo's value be substantial without any implicit guarantee from Govt" ? Will they be able finance their investment portfolios without implicit govt guarantee on their bonds.
Also, right now no dividend payments are being made to preferred and in Dec when the complete $187b is paid out to US Treasury, there is still no plans of what is going to be done to GSE profits which is substantial(Fannie mae in recent quarter earned $8.6b). See below lawsuit. The existing Net Sweep Agreement entitles the US Treasury to receive all profits (including settlement or restitution payments) from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A few preferred shareholders are currently suing the US challenging the Sweep Agreement and demanding the resumption of dividend payments. Here is a quote from seekingalpha article "Conservatorship alone doesn't absolve the FHFA from its fiduciary duty to shareholders of those companies. The notion of a breach of fiduciary duty on the site of the conservator could further increase chances that the Net Sweep won't stand its ground in court."
Here is somewhat different exit option -> Link
- Here is Bloomberg's Expert Review of Berkowitz Proposal.
- Street.com Article
- Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac's recent quarter earnings